News

Gold correction meets macro reset as ceasefire reverses key headwinds

Key points:

  • Gold’s recent selloff reflects liquidation and higher yields - not a breakdown in safe-haven demand.
  • An inflation shock driving up bond yields while lowering rate cut expectations and dollar strength have been the primary headwinds.
  • Structural support from central banks and diversification demand remains intact.
  • Ceasefire-driven macro shift has triggered a sharp rebound in gold and silver

Gold’s recent correction has challenged the widely held perception of bullion as a reliable safe haven during times of geopolitical stress. However, the latest price action should not be mistaken for a structural shift. Instead, it reflects a combination of macro headwinds and positioning dynamics following an extended rally.

At the core of the decline has been the nature of the shock itself. Unlike traditional risk-off environments that support gold, the Middle East conflict triggered a supply-driven inflation shock. Surging energy prices lifted inflation expectations, prompting a reassessment of central bank policy paths. Rate cut expectations were pushed out, bond yields moved higher, and the dollar strengthened - all factors that typically weigh on non-yielding assets such as gold.

At the same time, positioning played a key role. After a strong multi-month rally that saw gold trade significantly above its long-term trend, the market had become increasingly crowded. This left it vulnerable to bouts of long liquidation as investors reduced risk exposure and raised cash amid broader market volatility. In that sense, the correction has been as much technical as fundamental.

During the March correction, total holdings in bullion-backed ETFs fell 94 tons to 3,044 tons before rebounding by nearly 20 tons so far this month. In perspective, that reduction amounts to roughly 2½ months of buying and remains modest compared with the 545 tons accumulated during 2025.

Importantly, there is limited evidence to suggest a wholesale rotation away from gold into alternative assets. During the height of the selloff, flows were largely directed toward cash and short-duration fixed income, supported by rising yields and a stronger dollar. Energy exposure also acted as a more direct hedge against geopolitical risk. However, this dynamic has proven fluid, with recent developments triggering a partial reversal.

Looking ahead, gold’s trajectory will remain closely tied to macro variables, particularly real yields, dollar direction, and expectations around monetary policy. While near-term volatility is likely to persist, the broader outlook remains constructive. Continued central bank demand, ongoing geopolitical uncertainty, and concerns around fiscal sustainability all provide underlying support.

In that context, the recent decline appears more consistent with a correction than the beginning of a prolonged bear market. However, the duration and depth of the adjustment will depend on whether elevated real yields persist or begin to ease in response to softer growth signals.

Ceasefire triggers sharp rebound across precious metals

Today’s market response to the announced US-Iran ceasefire was imminent and pronounced with crude oil, fuel and bio-fuel linked crops all selling off while metals, both precious and industrials witnessed a strong comeback. Gold has rallied 2% to USD 4,805, a two-week high, while silver has surged 6% to USD 77.40, also marking a two-week peak.

The move has been driven by a reversal of the very factors that pressured prices in recent weeks. Bond yields have declined as inflation concerns ease, allowing rate cut expectations to re-emerge. At the same time, the dollar has weakened by more than one percent, providing additional support to dollar-denominated commodities.

Silver has outperformed, benefiting not only from lower yields and a softer dollar but also from its industrial exposure. Improved risk sentiment and reduced recession fears have supported copper prices, reinforcing demand expectations for silver through its industrial linkage.

Strategy and positioning

For investors, the recent price action reinforces the importance of distinguishing between short-term macro-driven volatility and longer-term structural trends.

From a tactical perspective, gold remains highly sensitive to interest rate expectations and currency moves, suggesting that timing remains important. From a strategic standpoint, however, the case for holding gold as a portfolio diversifier remains intact, particularly in an environment characterised by elevated geopolitical risk and ongoing macro uncertainty.

In practical terms, this argues for a measured approach. Long-term investors may view the recent correction as an opportunity to gradually rebuild exposure, while shorter-term participants may prefer to await clearer confirmation that yields and the dollar have peaked.

Investment demand for gold and silver ETFs have slowed while speculative longs in futures have suffered a major reset - Source: Bloomberg & Saxo
Gold has bounced from key support, with Fibo levels pointing to resistance around USD 4910-15 - Source: Saxo
Silver looks a bit messy and has yet to break a succession of lower highs and lows - Source: Saxo
This content is marketing material and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results. The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options..
Ole HansenHead of Commodity StrategySaxo Bank
Topics: Commodities Gold Silver Theme - Precious metals

investingLive Americas market news wrap: Oil prices surge as war worries mount

  • Iran expected to deliver counter-proposal to the US today - report
  • Trump signals to allies no immediate plans for Iran invasion
  • Houthis in Yemen announce entry into the conflict to support Iran
  • Secretary of State Rubio said that the war with Iran will continue for another 2-4 weeks
  • UMich final March consumer sentiment 53.3 vs 54.0 expected
  • ECB Schnabel: There is no need to rush into action
  • Philadelphia Fed Pres. Paulson: Fed has made notable progress bringing inflation down
  • More from Paulson: Impact of Iran War comes as inflation has been high
  • Fed's Barkin: Even before oil shock, progress on inflation was stalling
  • Iran hackers claim the breach of Kash Patel's personal email
  • Baker Hughes total rig count falls to 543 from 552 last week

Markets:

  • WTI crude oil up $5.59 to $100.07
  • S&P 500 down 1.7% to 6368
  • Gold up $135 to $4513
  • US 10-year yields up 3.6 bps to 5.00%
  • Bitcoin down 4.2%
  • USD leads, GBP lags

It was an ugly one for most markets today, with the exception of gold and oil. The Nasdaq fell to a six month low as war worries extended throughout the day. The positive backdrop of Trump extending his deadline to strike power facilities yesterday ultimately failed. The thinking is that the 10 day extension will add more pain and that a deal doesn't look promising.

As oil steadily climbed it pushed yields higher and equities lower. Compounding the pain in stocks is an intensifying selloff in tech stocks led by some of the highest flyers this year and last. That looks like a deleveraging move as the uncertainty around the economy grows. Early on in the conflict, there was trust this would wrap up in Trump's 4-5 week timeline but we just completed Week 4 and Rubio today said 2-4 more weeks.

Late in the day, the report about Houthis entering the war was questioned. US negotiator Steve Witkoff said he thinks there will be meetings with Iran this week and that Trump wants a peace deal. I guess all that is going to depend what Trump puts on the table. In an optimistic world maybe there is a way Iran gives up nuclear material in exchange for peace and sanctions relief. With that, Trump could also claim he stopped Iran from getting a nuclear weapon.

The market is also likely fearful of a US escalation over the weekend. The report about the US not using ground troops barely had an effect on the market as everything is quickly discounted as possible mis-information.

In terms of movers, the MAG7 looks like this:

  • Meta (META): down 4.0%
  • Amazon (AMZN): down 4.0%
  • Microsoft (MSFT): down 2.5%
  • Alphabet (GOOGL): down 2.5%
  • Nvidia (NVDA): down 2.2%
  • Tesla (TSLA): down 2.8%
  • Apple (AAPL): down 1.6%
This article was written by Adam Button at investinglive.com.

If inflation lingers, investors need better equities, not panic

Key takeaways

  • Sticky inflation hurts weak business models more than equities as an asset class.

  • Pricing power matters most when costs rise and rate cuts start to vanish.

  • Energy, select property, defensives, healthcare and some industrials can hold up better.

Bloomberg reported on 25 March 2026 that Trump administration officials are examining what oil at as much as 200 USD a barrel could mean for the economy. That sounds extreme, but markets are already treating it as more than a distant thought experiment. The message for investors is not that higher inflation means “sell equities.” It is that higher inflation raises the bar for what counts as a good equity.

Cash and fixed income are often the most exposed when inflation stays high, because their nominal payments do not rise with the cost of living. Over longer periods, equities have historically done a better job of preserving real returns across different inflation environments. Hartford Funds adds an important warning, though: equities beat inflation 90% of the time when inflation is low and rising, but when inflation is high and rising, the short-term record looks little better than a coin toss. Equities remain the broad long-term defence, but the real protection comes from owning businesses with pricing power.

 

The problem is not inflation. It is weak business models

Inflation tends to expose what was already fragile. Companies with thin margins, too much debt, weak brands or highly discretionary products have less room to absorb cost shocks. If they cannot raise prices, margins get squeezed. If they need lower interest rates to make the valuation story work, a higher-rate backdrop becomes a second headache. Warren Buffett has long argued that companies earning consistently high returns on invested capital, meaning they turn capital into profits efficiently, often have pricing power.

That also explains why inflation is not equally bad for every equity sector. The question is not whether costs rise. They usually do. The question is who gets to pass those costs on, who keeps demand, and who still looks necessary when households and businesses start choosing a bit more carefully.

The sectors built to cope

Integrated energy Energy is the clearest place to start because its revenues are tied most directly to the thing pushing inflation higher. Hartford’s work shows energy has historically been one of the strongest sectors in high and rising inflation, beating inflation 74% of the time with average real returns of 12.9%. If oil stays high, producers and energy infrastructure often benefit first. Good examples are large integrated groups and system-level operators such as Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Shell, TotalEnergies and Enbridge. They are different businesses, but they share real assets, scale and a more direct link between higher energy prices and cash flow.

Property and infrastructure Property and infrastructure-like assets can also help, though with more nuance. Hartford shows equity real estate investment trusts, or REITs, beat inflation 66% of the time in high and rising inflation periods because rents and asset values can reset over time. The same logic can apply to selected tower, logistics and regulated network businesses, where contracts, leases or tariff structures allow some repricing. Prologis, American Tower, Equinix, NextEra Energy and Southern Company fit that mould. The catch is that utilities still answer to regulators, so pass-through is not always quick or complete. Safe is not the same as bulletproof.

Consumer defensives, luxury and healthcare Consumer defensives and healthcare usually hold up better when inflation starts to hurt growth as well as prices. People may trade down, but they still buy groceries, detergent, medicines and basic care. Morningstar’s 2026 market-rotation work highlights consumer defensives among the leadership groups outside technology, and the wider lesson is simple: durable brands and habitual demand matter more when the weather turns messy. Walmart, Costco, Procter & Gamble, Coca-Cola and Unilever fit that logic. So, in a very different way, do high-end luxury names such as Ferrari, Hermès and LVMH, where brand strength and scarcity can support pricing power at the top end. In healthcare, names such as Johnson & Johnson, Roche, Merck, Eli Lilly and Danaher stand out for less cyclical demand and stronger competitive positions.

Select industrials Select industrials deserve more credit than they often get. Reuters noted this week that industrials can pass on higher costs better than many assume, especially when they sell mission-critical equipment, replacement parts, grid hardware or services into bottlenecked markets. That makes the sector more interesting than the simple “cyclical equals vulnerable” label suggests. Caterpillar, GE Vernova, Honeywell, Schneider Electric and Eaton are good examples. The better businesses are not just selling machinery. They are selling uptime, installed bases, service contracts and hard-to-delay spending. In inflationary periods, that distinction matters a lot.

The catches arrive quietly

This thesis still has risks. First, not every “defensive” stock has real pricing power. Some simply have defensive branding and little else. Second, if oil falls quickly because the conflict cools, energy’s tailwind can fade just as fast as it appeared. Third, high inflation can still hurt equities overall by compressing valuations, especially for businesses whose profits sit far in the future.

Investor playbook

  • Stress-test business models, not just inflation forecasts. Ask who can raise prices without losing customers.

  • Prefer strong balance sheets and steady demand over stories that need cheaper money to look sensible.

  • Treat sector labels carefully. A good industrial can beat a weak defensive.

  • Think in layers: broad equity exposure for long-term inflation defence, then tilt toward pricing power.

The real hedge is business quality

When officials start stress-testing 200 USD oil, investors should probably stress-test portfolios too. Not by assuming disaster, and not by dumping equities on sight, but by asking a simpler question: who can still protect margins if inflation lingers and rate cuts keep moving further away? That is the real dividing line.

Inflation is not a verdict on equities. It is an exam for business quality. The winners are often less glamorous than the last market darling, which is mildly inconvenient for cocktail-party storytelling, but rather useful for compounding. In an inflation scare, better equities matter more than brave predictions. That is the part worth remembering once the oil headline fades.

 

This material is marketing content and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results. The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options.
Ruben DalfovoInvestment StrategistSaxo Bank
Topics: Equities Highlighted articles

The FX Trader: BoJ leads seven incoming central bank meetings

Political considerations in the mix for the BoJ.

The latest

Muted volatility is the uninspiring watchword of the day across much of FX as the US dollar remains a barometer of cross-market risk sentiment. The US dollar peaked at the Friday close and around the Monday opening before generally weakening until early today as risk sentiment stabilized, even without notably positive news coming from the war front in Iran or sense the flows of oil and gas are set to normalize in any way through the Hormuz Strait.

The USD began firming from an early Wednesday low as crude oil prices are misbehaving badly once again later in the day, with the Brent crude oil benchmark rising sharply to new highs and above the highest daily close of the cycle (surprisingly 103.42 versus 108+ as of this writing) as Israel is bombing Iran’s energy infrastructure and Iran counters with threats to attack regional energy production infrastructure “previously thought safe”.

The USD is dually a safe haven from higher oil prices, enjoying both 1) the usual liquidity angle and the fact that the market was profoundly negative on the US dollar coming into this crisis (which hasn’t been priced as a crisis just yet, but more like a “cause of concern” and 2) because the US enjoys better supplied energy markets and vastly lower prices as it is closer to self-sufficiency in oil if regional imports are included in the mix, and total self sufficiency in gas.

Another currency enjoying a tailwind from the recent rise in oil and gas prices and with a turbo-charged rally yesterday is the Norwegian krone. EURNOK dove below 11.02 today, already yesterday clearing all the key range lows since early 2023 and brining the psychologically important 11.00 into view. Plenty more potential for an even lower EURNOK as long as energy deliveries to Europe are in doubt. A currency not providing any safe haven cachet

Central bank cavalcade today and tomorrow. The BoJ is the most interesting for potential signals. For most currencies, the coming central bank meetings are far less important than the additional volatility risks from any dramatic news from the war in Iran – or even just the market deciding that it is being too complacent – something we have argued in recent days. But a quick rundown of each of the central banks meeting today and tomorrow.

Bank of Canada 1345 GMT Wednesday Bottom line: not looking for surprises. The BoC was out just before we go live with this report. No surprise to see a muted reaction as the BoC prefers to “look through” the uncertainty from higher oil prices and the impact on inflation for now, concentrating on risks to lower growth. The market has priced a possible BoC hike for later this year, but the Canadian economic data is surprising very negatively lately and inflation was heading lower. The economy will weigh greaterfor the BoC, but the rate is already low.

FOMC Meeting - 1800 GMT Wednesday Bottom line: market not pricing surprises and unlikely to get firm takeaways from a lame duck Fed Chair and diverse FOMC views in the forecasts. The outlook is clouded by the recent mixed US data,some of which has been positive, and the jump in energy prices with is growth negative/inflation positive, an ugly mix for the dual-mandate Fed. , the market has quickly reduced the number of expected Fed rate cuts for the balance of this year from more than two to slightly less than one since the war in Iran began. We’re al waiting for the new Warsh-led Fed and how it will enable Bessent’s agenda more than this or the next FOMC meeting.

  • Bank of Japan – Thursday somewhere before or after 0300 GMT Bottom line: The market needs some guidance and Ueda needs to be careful about his dovish tendencies with USDJPY up against a level (160.00) that Japan’s finance minister doesn’t like after repeated verbal intervention ahead of that level this week. Also, Takaichi is set to meet with Trump tomorrow – new cycle highs wouldn’t be a good look, PR-wise. But what if oil prices are spiking well north of 110/barrel before then? Japan is one of the most reliant large economies to crude oil from the Hormuz Strait. Generally looking for the BoJ avoid pressure on JPY above all else which has to mean guiding for another rate hike soon to firm market expectations that they remain on track for policy tightening. But they have disappointed so often in recent history….
  • Swiss National Bank (SNB) – Thursday 0830 GMT Bottom line: SNB won’t need to deliver a super-strong message with EURCHF well above 0.9000 and with gold prices cratering as its safe haven bid hasn’t been there this week after the Monday spike lower. But expect the bank to deliver the message that its preferred tool is FX intervention in the event CHF does begin strengthening again.
  • Sweden Riksbank – Thursday 0830 GMT Bottom line: Riksbank has no choice to but wax a bit hawkish needing to do so to consider currency risks from weaker FX if an oil crisis lies ahead – might wax a bit more hawkish to counter risks from poor liquidity as its policy rate looks very low relative to global peers at 1.75%.
  • Bank of England – Thursday 1200 GMT Bottom line: The market has fairly removed all the former forward cut anticipation, helping to revive sterling. The Bank of England might look to buy time by wishy washy language fretting risks to inflation and growth but hoping it won’t have to guide for now, hoping clarity emerges before the next meeting. If we get proper risk off from war in Iran, sterling might come under pressure. No rate move is priced in for next several meetings.
  • ECB – Thursday 1315 GMT Bottom line: The ECB likely to reflexively talk up inflation risks – but will still want to buy time. The market is penciling in an ECB rate hike with low odds for the late April meeting, higher odds for the June meeting. More hawkish ECB is in the price, so firmer guidance would be needed to add to hike anticipation.

Chart focus: USDJPY The natural direction of pressure for USDJPY is to the upside as the USD is the dual safe haven on its invulnerability to oil supply disruptions and normal safe haven status, while Japan is over a barrel as long as crude oil prices streak higher, as it is one of the most dependent economies on oil supplies through the Hormuz Strait – and the Bank of Japan tends to underplay inflation risks relative to global peers. Meanwhile, one can’t make up the fact that Japan’s Ministry of Finance continues to intervene just ahead of 160.00 and PM Takaichi is to meet US President Trump on Thursday. Choppy, choppy price action expected if 160.00 is tested on market getting spooked by flows and intervention rumors.

Source: Saxo

FX Board of G10 and CNH trend evolution and strength. Note: If unfamiliar with the FX board, please see a video tutorial for understanding and using the FX Board.

The AUD has lost some steam today on risk off after AUD probed higher today again – the AU jobs report is up in Australia’s Thursday session. Elsewhere, the big shit has been in NOK strength and USD weakness since early this week faded a bit today.

Table: NEW FX Board Trend Scoreboard for individual pairs.

USDCAD is threatening to flip to an uptrend on the close today, but really needs a move and close above 1.3750 for confirmation that something is afoot. Elsewhere, the recent new EURJPY “downtrend” is nothing of the sort as that pair is rangebound for now, while Gold is interestingly teetering on a flip to the downside if it closes near current levels today – stay tuned.

This content is marketing material and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results. The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options..
John J. HardyGlobal Head of Macro StrategySaxo Bank
Topics: Forex Highlighted articles Trump Version 2 - Traders FR US Actualites et Analyses EURUSD USDJPY UKMustRead